Break In Reported at Las Vegas Shooter’s House Despite FBI Surveillance

Continued events affiliated with the Las Vegas Shooter defy any kind of logistical logic and the absence of answers is becoming infuriating.

As far as the public has been told Stephen Paddock is your average 64 year-old white liberal male with no history of crime or violent actions who managed to execute an advanced military style attack from a well secured Las Vegas casino with apparently no help and no witnesses. Now after hearing that a security officer actually did see and report the shooter around six minutes prior to the shooting we are also hearing that the Las Vegas Shooter had a home Reno which was stealthily broken into right in the middle of an FBI investigation.

Once again there are little to no answers about who and how they managed to break in and what exactly were they looking for as apparently nothing appeared to have been disturbed. How weird is this attack going to become before all the answers are actually revealed?

Via The Federalist Papers:

At least one person broke into the home. Police say they’re not aware of any theft or damages after the break-in, but wonder how the perpetrator gained entry. It is particularly surprising that someone managed to break into the home which is still being investigated by the FBI.

Stephen Paddock purchased the home in Reno’s Somersett neighborhood in 2013. He lived there with his girfriend, Marilou Danley.

Police confirmed on Tuesday that the Reno house was broken into over the weekend, and police are now highly active in the area after receiving a warning from the FBI to be sure a break in isn’t repeated.

The incident comes a time when investigators were scheduled to revisit the house. After the break-in was discovered, police notified the FBI immediately. The FBI has recently confirmed that investigators would be revisiting Paddock’s properties to “discern additional evidence as a result of that revisit.”

What is going on? And why are all the facts so convoluted and more importantly nonexistent?