I like what is going on here with the persistent legal challenges by the Trump Administration. No really, I do.
The choosing of the PResident of the United States needs to be something that is so vetted you could bet your house and everything that you own on it. At the end of the day, people need to be sure that they have gotten this thing totally right.
This is why every single challenge is proof to me that they are at least trying to get this thing totally right.
After the confusing changes between Sidney Powell and Tucker Carlson, the letter from Trump attorney Jenna Ellis and the remarks from Mike Flynn Jr. it is anyone’s guess what is going on inside the Trump camp. I do think that there is one thing we can rely on one … they are never going to quit until they have exhausted each and every last option, or have won.
Fox News is reporting:
‘The Third Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Trump campaign’s request for an expedited review of a lower court’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit over voting in Pennsylvania.
Trump campaign attorney Jenna Ellis tweeted the news with an image of the court record Monday morning.
The appeal comes after U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann in Pennsylvania threw out the campaign’s lawsuit, which sought an injunction that would stop the certification of the election in Pennsylvania. Most counties in the state are expected to certify their results on Monday.
The Trump campaign argued that the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law was violated by the state when counties took different measures to inform voters of technical issues that arose with the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots.
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, along with seven counties that were sued by the Trump campaign and where Joe Biden led, argued Trump had already raised similar claims.
Brann issued a blistering ruling in which he dismissed the case with prejudice, not allowing the Trump campaign to file an amended complaint.’
“Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters,” Brann stated. “This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated.”