A NYT Reporter Just Blew The MSM Narrative Of Jan 6 To Pieces! kristel March 12, 2022 Uncategorized We already knew that the January 6th Capitol protest is not an “insurrection” that the liberal media was trying to insist on. The media itself knew that they were lying everything about the Capitol protest to make January 6th worse than it actually was. Now, video footage was released that shows a New York Times reporter where he confirmed that January 6th was full “of FBI informants.” Though the name Ray Epps was not specifically mentioned, this still confirms that multiple FBI agents were involved. The said New York Times reporter even revealed that January 6th was a fake trauma and huge fake news! Listen to the exact words from this report below. Watch it here: Project Veritas/Youtube This person is not just any low-level reporter from the New York Times, we are dealing with a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter who is respected by his liberal colleagues as well as the rest of the mainstream media. This is only proved that the left media’s false narrative is falling apart! Here’s an excerpt from the Daily Caller report: A national security correspondent for The New York Times said the media’s coverage of the Capitol Riot was “overblown” and that the events of Jan. 6, 2021 were “no big deal,” according to undercover video released Tuesday by Project Veritas. NYT correspondent Matthew Rosenberg and his colleagues have described the reported presence of FBI plants among the rioters outside of the U.S. Capitol a year earlier as a “reimagining” of the “attack.” But in the Project Veritas video, which appears to have been recorded without his knowledge, Rosenberg paints a different picture and claims that “there were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the capitol.” “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized,” Rosenberg said in the video, “but like, all these colleagues who were in the (Capitol) building and are like, ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘fuck off!’” In the video, Rosenberg described the day of the Capitol Riot as “fun,” although he previously reported that the event was “a violent interruption to the transition of power,” according to Project Veritas. “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there outside and we were just having fun,” Rosenberg said. Yes, the truth will always come out but I didn’t expect to hear it from mainstream media reporters! “NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.””https://t.co/vBe2pE2fBU — Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) March 9, 2022 A Pulitzer prize-winning NYT reporter was caught in a Project Veritas sting admitting his colleagues totally exaggerated Jan. 6 danger & fear. “Dude come on you were not in any danger,” Matthew Rosenberg said. He’s referring to @ESCochrane & @npfandos. https://t.co/omwfWocMiY — Andy Ngô ?️? (@MrAndyNgo) March 9, 2022 Despite being not on the ground when January 6 happened, these leftist media are pretending to be traumatized so that they can bash President Trump and the rest of the conservative movement. And now this New York reporter is the one who’s bashing his colleagues now. The Washington Examiner also reported: Project Veritas posted footage of a New York Times reporter alleging media coverage of Jan. 6 was excessive. The conservative group published a video on Tuesday of New York Times National Security Correspondent Matthew Rosenberg alleging some of his colleagues overreacted to the events. “All these colleagues who were in the building, and they’re young and are like, ‘Oh my God, it was so scary,’” Rosenberg said in a clip posted by Project Veritas. “I’m like, ‘F*** off.’” He later added that “[the Times is] not the kind place I can tell somebody to man up, but I kind of want to be like, ‘Jude, come on, like, you were not in any danger.’” In a separate clip, Rosenberg listed several colleagues who were reportedly at the Capitol on Jan. 6, only to describe some of them as “f***ing b****es” due to their claims of being traumatized by the Jan. 6 events. Rosenberg went on to say he wasn’t as in favor of his Jan. 6 reporting as it may appear. Rosenberg’s managing editor asked him, “Can we do like part two of that like, what’s going on a year since Jan. 6, kind of like memory-holing it,” the national security correspondent said in the video. “Like maybe ‘it’s no big deal.’ Yeah. We can do that. It’s a little quick turnaround. So, that’s what we’ve been doing the last few days.” Rosenberg added he believes the Left overreacted as much as some on the Right underreacted to Jan. 6. I hope that Rosenburg’s statement will make more reporters in the mainstream media begin to speak out and tell the truth about January 6th. Sources: We Love Trump, Daily Caller, Washington Examiner Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.