Electric Vehicles (EV’s) might not be the future we want…
Despite the massive deception, the technology isn’t even close to comparing to the efficacy and cost of ICE and Diesel vehicle technology.
For those pundits that claim the technology will only improve, that’s yet another deception and fraud. Why do I say this? Read up on the Invention Secrecy Act, then become familiar with 35 U.S.C. 181; the so-called Secrecy of Certain Inventions and Withholding of Patent to understand there are suffocating national security measures against inventions and new energy technology.
National security is all about maintaining the monopolies and oligopolies that have been ruling our economy. This ought to be the fact everyone knows.
Meanwhile, our dementia-ridden President wants the United States to switchover to electric vehicles.
Well, if you still in doubt, let’s hear from an auto industry analyst himself, Neil Winton, who happens to be a senior contributor to Forbes.
Winton says that’s a load of hooey, while EVs may look ideal if you’re just going by the manufacturer’s spec sheet, the real-world performance of these cars is very different than what’s promised when it comes to range.
“A brand-new electric car is gleaming on your driveway and your first reaction is going to be excitement, followed perhaps by a smidgen of smugness,” Winton wrote in a Forbes piece last month.
“Make sure you enjoy that moment because the next one will be fury after you plug it into your house and the range attained after a full charge has no relation to the number suggested by the dealer, or the one written down in the car’s specification details.”
Western Journal explain the piece of Winton’s in a way we understand:
The problem, Winton says, is that range numbers are derived from driving conditions divorced from real-world driving. Instead, they’re based on the computerized Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure, or WLTP — a laboratory test that aims to measure and standardize EV range numbers.
This means that the range you get could be, in real-world scenarios, up to 32 percent less than what’s promised. That’s the biggest deviation Winton found when he looked at 20 different EV models in a test published Tuesday. (The big loser was the Mini Electric, which had a WLTP range claim of 145 miles but could only muster 98.5 given real-world battery capacity.)
However, when you get on the highway, things get worse. In one case — the Polestar 2, manufactured by Volvo’s performance brand — Winton’s test results found drivers would only get about 40 percent of the advertised range.
Why? Well, if “you drive at normal cruising speeds with the air conditioning on, the media system doing its stuff and the heater making you snug,” it’s a drain on the battery that the manufacturer didn’t figure in when it calculated the vehicle’s range numbers.
EVs do worse than advertised on the highway for a number of reasons. For starters, electric motors are far more efficient in stop-and-go driving conditions than during highway driving, partially because of regenerative braking; EVs use the friction caused when you slow your car down to recharge the battery. Braking doesn’t happen much during highway driving, however, which is why the advertised range drops precipitously.
You can continue reading it here: WesternJounal
Sources: WesternJounal, Forbes