Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Voter fraud is an extremely serious issue in every election, and especially the United States.

While liberals have fought to the end of the earth to downplay the issue, they only do it for self serving reasons because they are the ones that are engaging in illegal practices.

We have been told over and over over the years that there is no problem whatsoever and that requiring identification to vote is nothing more than some attempt by Republicans to act against minorities that would be affected by voter ID laws.

However, after Trump’s victory, liberals suddenly saw voter fraud everywhere. Trump only could have won with the help of the Russians or vote rigging in swing states, according to many liberals.

But instead of being content with the victory, Trump called their bluff, opting to form a commission to look into the claims of voter fraud during the presidential election.

And as reported at Fox News, a federal judge on Monday opened the door for President Donald Trump’s commission on election fraud to resume collecting detailed voter roll information from the states.

Last month, the commission solicited states for publicly available data including registered voters’ names, birth dates, and partial Social Security numbers.

However, a judge put a hold on their plans, forcing the commission to hold off until a related lawsuit filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington was settled.

Now, US District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly has denied the advocacy group’s request to block the data collection in a ruling that commission vice chairman Kris Kobach called “a major victory for government accountability, transparency and the public’s right to know about the integrity of our elections processes.”

“The commission requested this publicly available data as part of its fact-gathering process, which is information that states regularly release to political candidates, political parties and the general public,” said Kobach, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas.

The judge ruled that since the commission was not an actual government agency that it was not subject to such assessments.

All that can be said is that if liberals have nothing to hide when it comes to what they are doing during election cycles they should be more than willing that one vote to one person and no more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.