Learn more about RevenueStripe...
You Might Like

After initially downplaying the threat, the WHO labeled the coronavirus a pandemic over a year ago. It’s no secret that the disease, as well as the response to it, has flipped our world upside-down since the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in late 2019. Every time Dr. Fauci speaks, the mandates, lockdowns, and guidelines appear to shift. All of these unprecedented measures, we were informed, were put in place to slow the spread of a disease that has now been linked to the deaths of nearly half a million Americans and 3.7 million people worldwide in the last year.

You’d think that researchers would focus on prophylactic and therapeutic remedies for this disease, given that it’s a death sentence for the elderly, obese, and those with pre-existing diseases. Children have been required to stay home from school, wear masks, and get vaccinated because of the coronavirus. One would assume that after all this time, hospitals, nursing homes, and other treatment facilities would have reached a consensus on how to treat a Covid positive patient or resident. This isn’t the case at all.

There is yet no agreed-upon treatment approach for older people infected with the coronavirus to help them recover.

Unless a patient was in grave distress, the CDC and Dr. Fauci ignored treatment plans for coronavirus patients.

Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and a professor of medicine, testified in Texas earlier this year.

Dr. McCullough evaluates COVID patients and claims that 85 percent of those who are given a multi-drug treatment plan recover completely from the disease.

McCullough went on to say, “The pandemic could have been over by now, he says, if those who tested positive for covid had been immediately treated before they fell ill enough to be hospitalized. He also says that thousands could have been, and still could be saved if the treatment protocol he and other physicians use were not suppressed.”

And then there’s this…

The website c19hcq.com keeps track of all international investigations on hydroxychloroquine and its coronavirus impacts.

A new study has been released, and the results are shocking!

— COVID-19 HCQ: in-the-moment meta-analysis of 245 studies

When administered late and at high doses over a long length of time, HCQ is ineffective (RECOVERY/SOLIDARITY); however, effectiveness improves with earlier use and better dosing. Early treatment, on the other hand, consistently produces beneficial results. That’s how science works.

The figures are incredible!

  • ** Hydroxychloroquine worked on COVID-19 last spring.
  • ** Hydroxychloroquine worked on COVID-19 last fall.
  • ** Hydroxychloroquine worked on COVID-19 last winter.
  • ** Hydroxychloroquine works on COVID-19 today.

Dr. Fauci and the CDC banned HCQ as a treatment for coronavirus.

They lied about its effects.

They lied about its dangers.

Larry Johnson, a TGP writer, addressed this on Wednesday night, citing passages from Headline USA coverage on Dr. Fauci’s hydroxychloroquine emails.

However, the e-mails revealed that Fauci knew more than he let on about some of the Trump administration’s suggested treatment options.

During a news conference remark regarding the benefits of utilizing hydroxychloroquine, he famously second-guessed then-President Donald Trump.

In a White House press briefing on March 25, Fauci refuted President Trump:

Although Fauci was taken aback and stated that the “anecdotal” claims had yet to be conclusively examined, he had been looped into an email to Pence on Feb. 29 in which a pair of Oklahoma physicians described their research extensively.

Fauci also responded to a question from a reporter on Feb. 24 about China’s clinical trials with the medicine. “Is there any indication/data to substantiate this claim from China (attached publication) that chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine can decrease COVID-19 infections and lung disease?” wrote Maryland pharmacologist Philip Gatti.

“There are no data in this brief report and so I have no way of evaluating their claim,” he wrote dismissively.

“There are a lot of these types of claims going around,” he continued. “I would love to see their data.”

Dr. Fauci then told CNN in May that hydroxychloroquine was actually “dangerous” and useless.

When administered as a coronavirus preventive, Dr. Fauci told CNN that hydroxychloroquine was indeed harmful.

Hydroxychloroquine had been used safely in millions of people for 65 years.

As a result, the messaging was carefully prepared to convey that the medicine is safe for other purposes but harmful when used for Covid-19.

This claim made headlines across the fake news media, and it was a pure fabrication.

Following Fauci’s comments on hydroxychloroquine, the tech behemoths started suppressing any mention of the medicine. President Trump and anyone who believed the medicine was safe and effective was derided by the media. Doctors who treat coronavirus patients have had their social media accounts suspended.

Hundreds of thousands of people died as a result.

Everything was predicated on a lie told by Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Strangely, Dr. Fauci endorsed the use of HCQ to treat the MERS coronavirus in 2013. What went wrong?

When history is written, Dr. Tony Fauci will be remembered as one of the most heinous mass murderers of our time.

In the United States, he financed coronavirus research. After it was banned in the United States, he supported it in China. Then he underestimated the disease’s seriousness. Then he claimed that a successful remedy for a hazardous man-made pathogen had been discovered.

Fauci is a ruthless assassin. Fauci should be detained.

Here are two of the many prior TGP reports on the usefulness of HCQ.

Watch it here: Youtube/AP Achive

Sources: thegatewaypundit.com (1), worldmeters.info, c19hcq.com, thegatewaypundit.com (2), headlineusa.com (1), headlineusa.com (2), documentcloud.org (1), documentcloud.org (2), nbcnews.com, thegatewaypundit.com (3),thegatewaypundit.com (4),thegatewaypundit.com (5)

About The Author

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.