Whenever there is someone that makes such a grandstanding speech like the one Oprah made over the last week you know that there is always something hidden behind it.
Everyone’s praising Oprah’s “brave” speech at the Golden Globes, but there’s one HUGE problem.
Oh, Oprah might really be against rape. But the notion that she actually cares insofar as young Hollywood actresses were being sexually assaulted for decades is laughable.
Otherwise, how in the world can Oprah explain her long and close relationship with Hollywood’s chief sexual assailant, Harvey Weinstein? As with Weinstein’s other top-tier Hollywood buddies, either Oprah knew, or she’s dumb as a brick.
That very recent pictures doesn’t look like Oprah’s “out of the loop” when it comes to Weinstein’s misdeeds. It looks like someone who knows her good friend intimately.
Conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin went further, directing the biggest problem with Oprah’s supposedly “brave” speech:
“Why didn’t she say: ‘I’m standing here before you today Hollywood and you should be embarrassed of yourselves. You should all be embarrassed of yourselves to be part of a community that tolerated decades of debauchery, decades of sexual molestation, decades of sexual harassment. And there are many of you in the audience who knew who the perpetrators are and were and never came forward, in order to protect your careers or promote your careers…’
“Now that would have been a SPEECH worthy of a presidential wannabe. But no, no. Instead we hear about Jim Crow and the NAACP. Which is fine, but has nothing at all to do with what’s taking place today in Hollywood. Nothing. Nothing.
“What she should have told girls watching there is NOT to stand by while other girls are being molested and harassed because you want to become famous. Because you don’t want to rock the boat. Because you don’t want to challenge the Harvey Weinsteins of the world.
“No she didn’t say that.”
Why didn’t she say that?